So, at the end of the Region One Board Of Education meeting on June 4th I asked Phil Hart, Chair of the board, re: The Aeron Watson (Scott Fellows) letter, who was the attorney and who was the client in the attorney/client privilege claim made by the board and it’s attorney against Gale Toensing? I was told the client for the attorney was the board.
I then asked if because our superintendent was provided a copy of the letter from the attorney, did not that break the attorney/client privilege? I was told that our superintendent was an agent of the board. Well…if that is so, so is Gale Toensing being that she IS A BOARD MEMBER! So why was Gale denied access to the letter? I guess I will ask that at the next board meeting.